Is gastric pneumatosis a clue to upper gastrointestinal obstruction?
İrem İnanç
, Sadettin Yıldız
, Merve Keskin Çakıcı
, Ümit Nusret Başaran
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Türkiye.
Keywords: Annular pancreas, down syndrome, duodenal obstruction, gastric pneumatosis, radiologic findings.
Abstract
Gastric pneumatosis is an uncommon radiologic finding in children and may suggest underlying gastrointestinal pathology. Herein, we reported a five-month-old male infant with Down syndrome who presented with a one-month history of recurrent nonbilious vomiting. Upright abdominal radiography showed a markedly dilated stomach and intramural gas along the gastric wall, raising suspicion for proximal intestinal obstruction. An upper gastrointestinal contrast study revealed a partial obstruction at the level of the duodenum. Surgical exploration identified an annular pancreas encircling the second portion of the duodenum. Due to the anatomical configuration, a duodenojejunostomy was performed. The patient tolerated postoperative enteral feeding and was discharged uneventfully. At the six-month follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic with appropriate weight gain. This case demonstrates that gastric pneumatosis, although rare, may serve as an early indicator of upper gastrointestinal obstruction. Recognizing this finding on plain radiographs can expedite further diagnostic evaluation and enable timely surgical management. Clinicians should consider anatomical causes, including congenital duodenal anomalies, particularly in syndromic infants with persistent vomiting.
Citation: İnanç İ, Yıldız S, Keskin Çakıcı M, Başaran ÜN. Is gastric pneumatosis a clue to upper gastrointestinal obstruction?. Turkish J Ped Surg 2026;40(2):106-109. doi: 10.62114/JTAPS.2026.139.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
AI Disclosure
The authors declare that artificial intelligence (AI) tools were not used, or were used solely for language editing, and had no role in data analysis, interpretation, or the formulation of conclusions. All scientific content, data interpretation, and conclusions are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors further confirm that AI tools were not used to generate, fabricate, or ‘hallucinate’ references, and that all references have been carefully verified for accuracy.
All authors contributed equally to this article.
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.
